Holding Our PoliticiansACCOUNTABLE
You Betcha! Logo - Click to return home
← Back to All Promises

Assert Canada’s leadership in supporting women and girls by protecting funding for sexual and reproductive health care and rights,

Status:NOT STARTED

Promised: 2025-04-XX

Last Updated:

Fact-Check: Mark Carney's Promise to Assert Canada's Leadership in Supporting Women and Girls by Protecting Funding for Sexual and Reproductive Health Care and Rights

Overview of the Promise

During his campaign for prime minister, Mark Carney pledged to assert Canada's leadership in supporting women and girls by protecting funding for sexual and reproductive health care and rights, education, and combatting child marriage. The promise emphasized ensuring that foreign assistance is gender responsive and helps the poorest and most vulnerable, especially amid global threats to women's rights and rollbacks in reproductive rights.

Actions Taken by the Carney Government

Since assuming office in March 2025, the Carney government has made several moves that appear to contradict the promise of protecting funding and asserting leadership on these issues. One of the first actions was the elimination of the cabinet position for the Minister of Women and Gender Equality, which was part of a broader reduction of cabinet roles by about a third. This decision has been widely criticized by advocacy groups as a setback for gender equality efforts, potentially undermining dedicated oversight for women's and girls' issues, including sexual and reproductive health.

On the funding front, forecasts indicate significant cuts to the budget of Women and Gender Equality Canada, with advocates warning of an 81 percent reduction by 2028. This projected cut has been described as disproportionate and shocking, raising concerns that it could reverse decades of progress in supporting women and girls domestically and internationally. While the government has continued some pre-existing commitments, such as a $1.7 million funding announcement in February 2025 for improving access to sexual and reproductive health services, this occurred prior to Carney's leadership and does not reflect new initiatives under his administration.

Regarding foreign assistance, there has been no new legislation or major funding announcements under Carney to enhance gender-responsive aid specifically targeting sexual and reproductive health, education, or combatting child marriage. The government's platform included general pledges to protect public health care and modernize systems, but these have not translated into targeted actions for the promise's elements. Instead, the focus has shifted, with some outlets noting a reorientation toward broader "Canadian identity" priorities in cabinet restructuring.

Legislation Proposed or Passed

No specific legislation has been proposed or passed by the Carney government directly related to protecting funding for sexual and reproductive health care and rights, education, or combatting child marriage. The Liberal platform during the April 2025 election mentioned intentions to make an access to abortion fund permanent and provide up to $20,000 for IVF treatments, but these have not advanced to legislative stages as of August 2025. The elimination of the dedicated gender equality ministry has instead sparked calls from northern organizations and advocates to reinstate it, but no such bills have been introduced.

Analysis of Key Promise Points

The promise to protect funding for sexual and reproductive health care and rights has been undermined by the planned budget cuts to relevant departments, which advocates argue will radically reduce support levels. On education and combatting child marriage, there are no reported new initiatives or funding protections under Carney, leaving these areas unaddressed. Ensuring foreign assistance is gender responsive and aids the poorest has seen continuity from prior commitments, like Canada's ongoing 10-year global health and rights pledge, but no enhancements or assertions of leadership have emerged, amid criticisms that domestic cuts signal a retreat from international advocacy.

Overall, these actions suggest a deprioritization rather than protection, with the risk of the promise being broken if budget cuts proceed without reversal.

Overall Status

This promise is broken.

Sources

← Back to All Promises